Asymmetric relation - Oxford Reference
Additionally, we define a measure called the interdependence point, and the effect is greater for trophic relationships than for mutualistic and. This concept can apply to relationships too. If one friend is taking advantage of the other, this is an asymmetrical relationship because it's not equal or fair. A relation R defined on a set S and having the property thatwhenever x R ythen it is never the case From: asymmetric relation in A Dictionary of Computing».
We are responsible and stand at both ends of the professional relation, he says. The examples are all from professional work with people with very severe acquired brain damages. They all live in a protected setting, constantly and permanently depending on different kinds of support. The professionals can be rooted in care or pedagogy or both, and the examples are to be seen in a Danish context.
On this background I will reflect on a modern understanding of being a professional in areas of care, pedagogy and education. He was inspired from famous philosophers working with phenomenology as Husserl and Heidegger, and later with Sartre and Derrida. He became a French citizen already in World War he was imprisoned — and he was Jewish. In Denmark we have a tradition of referring either to the Danish philosopher K. These situations could involve professionals working with care, pedagogy, social work, teaching, therapists or others.
Reading German literature on e. This is not the case in Denmark - so far. Perhaps because it seems too demanding? Or did we move away from the idealism making these types of professional work a mere tool for earning a salary? And in exactly the fields where they can seem idealistic and demanding?
Power relations might be seen from many perspectives. A few important terms and concepts In the face of the other you will read a need for help and support and the term face should not be understood too literally. You see the Other and not only the concrete Other, but a track mirroring all others with e. The face is a kind of generalized cultural print.
An observation of the face will call for a responsibility that you cannot turn down.
You cannot turn your back on this responsibility as a professional and you cannot do it as a human being in general. You must deal with it. It is a kind of test, and you are not always fully conscious about it, but in this testing 2 your own ethical being is raised. The ethical demand is strong and you cannot do anything else than helping. As a professional you think you are in a powerful position but perhaps you are not.
The question of symmetry and dissymmetry might look different than we think in our everyday understanding. Sensitivity in touching, listening and observing is very important. We must in a way be patient and not always hurry on in cognitive recognition and intentionality, he says. Passivity can be very important.
The meeting is followed by openness and a readiness for changing yourself. My work build on a phenomenological approach with observations and different types of interviews. A professional social educator and nurse says: I feel better here at work, because I actually bring them home meaning she is worried about the citizens when she is in her private home …when I am here I feel we are equal but when I am driving towards home…oh, I really pity her one specific womanwhat a fate destinyand I am not thinking like that while I am here.
Then we are equal and we have a dialogue. Even if one specific woman causes these thoughts, she is kind of symbol or mirror for all the people in this setting. When the professional person is able to read and the person with brain damage has lost some competencies, you might find it obvious that the professional Elsa is the powerful part in the asymmetric situation.
One fine morning I observe the social educator and a man, Peter, with severe brain damage, sitting cozily next to each other. She reads the newspaper aloud to him, and he sits relaxed with a smile in his face. Elsa finds small pieces of news and read them out aloud. He smiles and makes small comments, 3 and you can see that he is observant and follows her. Then Elsa asks if she should read a certain part, and Peter says that he probably would not have chosen that part.
Soon after they finish the reading, and Peter says thank you, it has been nice - but he had never read the newspaper that thoroughly, he adds.
Our senses are important in the encounter. We can learn from all of them: And we must use our imagination and creativity to interpretate what we experience this way. Every situation is new and this is important to have in mind as a professional. A social educator; Elsa, sits next to a woman, Lene, in a wheel chair — without any verbal language — and with very low arousal and almost without mobility in her hands.
This woman indicates interest in a certain activity, and I observe the social educator holding Lenes hand, touching her arm and imitating the movements trying to decorate a small box with a color, chosen by Lene. I am so close that I can hear Lenes breathing. After this small activity lasting perhaps 8 minutes I ask Elsa how she could know what Lene wanted. It had been difficult, Elsa said, and she also found it difficult to explain it to me.
You might say this is a parallel to the face. Language mirrors something more than just information. Here you might find a link to the person, Lene, that existed before the brain damage. A woman, Dorte, with brain damage is dependent on the professional in doing her bathroom rituals. The professional, Elsa, has to be ready for the next task outside the room at a certain time and she asks Dorte to hurry up.
Relationship Symmetry in Social Networks: Why Facebook will go Fully Asymmetric
Dorte starts crying and as a result she has a bad start of the day and she asks the professional to leave. Dorte is sad, and Elsa is sad and feels so bad about the situation, that she later on discusses this with the manager, expressing critique about the structure and about how her work as a professional is organized.
To be a hostage and having a very special responsibility might sound very incompatible to a modern concept of autonomy. We kind of celebrate autonomy in our modern world, and if you as a professional can be seen as and experience being a hostage, you might consider this as an offense to your personal and professional autonomy. Are you supposed to take this responsibility just because you have a job as caregiver or social educator and how do you deal with this?
And from these initial, structural decisions the future of the services are, at least partially, determined.
As I noted above, for some entities on Facebook the relationship is asymmetric. You and Meit is not. Facebook has designed a service that forces you to keep track of your friends, whether you want to or not.
By this they mean that they want to model the relationships between all people. If you have a friend in meat space, they want to model it in software. But it has become increasingly clear that Facebook is modeling personal relationships, not relationships based on attention.
I doubt I could ever have as many friends on Facebook as followers on Twitter, because if I did I would have to pay attention to all of them, all of the time. For the most part, if you use Twitter you accept this discrepancy. This is how attention works. He would immediately be overwhelmed. We understand that attention is often one-way.
Facebook will announce this publicly in their common way, by saying their goal is to help you connect to your friends and family better.
asymmetrical | Definition of asymmetrical in English by Oxford Dictionaries
The actual design of the system will hardly come up. Ev Williams will probably tweet something completely unrelated. The real reasons why Facebook will go asymmetric are reach growth and data. People will realize the same benefits they currently do on Twitter…you can actually start to have an audience that is larger than your current friends list.
In other words, this will allow members of Facebook to have a much larger reach than they could before…thus giving Facebook a larger reach as well. In short, Facebook will improve the ability of its members to accrue social capital within the system. He also describes the way humans have trouble with exchanging social capital with economic capital. While personal relationship data must be extremely valuable, this additional attention data is being left on the table.
Hearken back to the few days last fall when follower numbers were going wonky…twitterers were up in arms! The attention Twitterers have accrued in their followers is worth serious cash. Imagine the effort of rebuilding your follower list. For example, it would take me 20 times as long to build my Twitter list as it would rebuild my Facebook friends list! A lot of money.
What of Other Networks?