| Antiwar literary and philosophical selections | Page 12
Putin's walk-on role in the campaign was on display at the CNN Republican presidential debates on Wednesday, perhaps inevitably. And gradually they'll surrender even their pet 'republican' . NATO Tiger Meet was not only this year's largest exercise, but also the largest combat training missions amongst the participating 20 Squadrons of NATO. January 2, , AM Since the early Cold War, the Republican Party has been the bedrock of U.S. defense and vice versa. Yet none of the key players within the campaign — other than the It is a rare fool who fears a paper tiger. .. would not, articulating policy on issues like NATO enlargement.
President Dwight Eisenhower stood by with only murmurs of protest as the people of Hungary were trampled in ; President George H.
Think Again: The Republican Party
Bush did the same decades later after the Tiananmen Square massacre. But Reagan stirred the pot and worked with like-minded allies to oust communist dictators.
In the simplest terms, values are what divide us from them and them from us. There are those who believe that American values form a moral imperative for U. That is what Republicans have stood for abroad and the distinction they must now again draw with their Democratic counterparts. There are plenty, many on the left, who oppose the idea of American moral leadership.
This is not because they are unpatriotic, self-hating commies to coin a phrase. Rather, it is because they believe in neither the uniqueness of the American experience nor the superiority of the American system. Some Republicans might also agree — think Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma or Sen. Mike Lee of Utah. Bush and his emissary to the Dark Side, Dick Cheney. Just as clearly, the Romney campaign and the Republican Party as a whole agreed.Nato tiger meet 2013
Romney did not use Bush or Cheney as surrogates on the campaign trail, and neither spoke at — or even attended — the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida. Indeed, many members of Congress elected in the anti-Obama wave of would just as soon forget the Bush years, and green-eyeshade types in the party consider greater defense spending and global leadership as luxuries of an earlier era.
But letting Obama off scot-free for allowing anti-Bush derangement to color his policymaking was a mistake.
Romney was so afraid of being labeled a warmonger that he failed to articulate how the United States might affect the conflict in Syria; he was so fearful of being tarred with the Cheney brush that he never mentioned that Osama bin Laden was found as a result of intelligence gleaned in part from Bush-era interrogations. In truth, there are ample lessons to be found in both the Bush administration and the Cold War years.
Republicans need to find new leaders who can apply those lessons to the problems we face today and carry them into the future. One of the most substantial roadblocks to revitalizing Republican liberal internationalism is the financial and physical fatigue that naturally flows from a decade of war and a corrosive recession. Every candidate said it, I have said it, and the American people say it too.
Support among independents for an active foreign policy has declined by 15 percentage points in the past decade, according to a poll by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, and a recent Pew Research Center study found that most Americans think the United States should share global leadership with others.
Of course, Obama tried to take advantage of such attitudes. Obama made it clear that education, infrastructure, and manufacturing had to be the priorities going forward. Thus foreign policy was cleverly transformed into a domestic issue: For the United States to be strong abroad, he argued, Americans had to put their own house in order first. Yet weariness remains one of the great shibboleths of U. In reality, Americans continue to support, usually with significant majoritiesoverseas military operations, at least at their outset.
Even after more than 11 years of conflict, poll after poll finds that Americans support the notion of a U. A February poll had supporters beating opponents by 18 percentage points. Obama may want to focus on nation-building at home, but the slow-motion train wreck of the European Union, the fading of democracy in Russia, the war in Syria, the rise of China, North Korean weapons proliferation, the spread of al Qaeda, the continued strength of Chavismo in South America, the war in Afghanistan, and the failure of Pakistan still constitute major security threats.
They need to work to bring along the many even within the party who doubt the imperative of success against al Qaeda, who doubt the value of friendly governments, and for whom each penny spent on a new fighter for the Air Force or aircraft carrier for the Navy is a penny wasted.
You cannot hope to persuade the country if you cannot persuade your own party. But where has it left the country? Leading from behind — an absurd notion that itself must be left behind. After all, neither France, whose presidents have led on both Libya and Syria, nor the U. Security Council can solve the thorny problems we now face. We grow weary of it at times….
Nato Tiger Meet
But if we are not to shoulder the burdens of leadership in the free world, then who will? Wherever there were great populations, great masses of people found themselves without work, without money, and unable to get food. Famine was in every working-class quarter in the world within three weeks of the beginning of the war.
Within a month there was not a city anywhere in which the ordinary law and social procedure had not been replaced by some form of emergency control, in which firearms and military executions were not being used to keep order and prevent violence. And still in the poorer quarters, and in the populous districts, and even here and there already among those who had been wealthy, famine spread. But the war does not pause. The flags still fly.
Fresh air-fleets rise, new forms of airship, and beneath their swooping struggles the world darkens—scarcely heeded by history. United States Navy engineers upgraded the facility for temporary or intermediate use as a standby war base.
Work on a new concrete runway, 61 by 3, meters, with 61 m overruns at each end, began in and was completed in Support continued for B operations until 1 Julywhen Zaragoza AB was placed on standby status with the withdrawal of the B from active service. This transfer was made in order that all USAF fighter assets in Europe could be concentrated in one command.
Provided general radar surveillance over Spain.
The squadron was headquartered at Zaragoza AB beginning in January The squadron operated a site near Elizondo, Spain, one of seven Radar sites in Spain operated by the 65th Air Division which provided early warning of unidentified aircraft and controlled NATO airspace over the region. Weapons training detachments were principally F-4 aircraft, although Fs used the wing's ranges for a short period inand U. Navy A-7s used range facilities in June Intwo significant events took place, which had an effect on the wing's operation.
Headquarters USAF designed POMO to establish a maintenance management system which would enhance sortie production by improving the utilization of maintenance personnel. On 1 Januarythe support mission expanded when the th assumed responsibility for various functional areas in support of the four USAF tropo-scatter communication sites at Humosa, Menorca, Soller, and Inoges.
Foremost among the accomplishments of the th TFTW during was the preparation and planning for reception of the F Weapons Training Detachments which began in This represented the initial use of the C-model F aircraft at the range since the newer Fs were introduced to the European theatre.