Did Gaskell rush the ending of North & South? — More Than Thornton
Page vs Screen: North and South by Elizabeth Gaskell and the BBC periodical) , it's a social novel that showcases the relations between workers and . It ends with a confrontation between Thornton and Margaret after the. "North and South" is a novel defined by the resolution of binary conflicts: at the end of the novel, we see the proper structure of an intimate relationship: both. North and South is a social novel published in by English writer Elizabeth Gaskell. Gaskell's first novel, Mary Barton (), focused on relations between . The text in the book, particularly the ending, differs significantly from that of the .
Margaret's visit to London for the Great Exhibition.
In the book Edith kept insisting that Margaret come visit her, but she didn't. Here they added the visit and had it coincide with the Fair. It gives her a chance to see Thornton admired by men in London, it helps to increase her opinion of him.
The Concept of Unity in Elizabeth Gaskell's "North and South"
It ends with a confrontation between Thornton and Margaret after the matter of Leonard's death. Finally, the fourth episode starts with Higgins coming to the Hales to ask for advice about finding work in the South as no one will hire him in Milton and he needs work so he can maintain poor Boucher's children.
Also with Mrs Thornton's "remonstrances" to Margaret about her behaviour by being seeing after dark, alone with a gentleman. We've got the final two deaths and Margaret's time in London with her Aunt. It ends with the Proposal, albeit quite different from the scene in the book!
Main differences between the series and the novel: You have to pay close attention in the series Margaret mentions the seasons in her letters to be aware of the passage of time the story covers a 3-year period.
In the book we spend a longer time at the Vicarage in Helstone before going North, and get a much closer look at Mr Hale's worries and final decision which in the series we only get bits and pieces of from comments between other people Thornton's overseer and landlord of the Hale's new house.
Mr Hale only explains it to the family once they're in Milton and after his wife and daughter confront him about the fact that "people are talking". The series also shows the entire family as going straight to Milton, instead of Mrs Hale and Dixon spending time at the coast.
Margaret's first meeting of John Thornton in the book is in the hotel she and her father are staying in. It leaves neither one of them with a good first impression of the other she is prejudiced against tradesmen and is too tired from house hunting to pay him much attention while they wait for her father.
This is in sharp contrast to the series in which her first encounter with Thornton is in his own Mill where she witnesses him chase after and beat one of the workers for having a lit pipe in the sorting room which is full of floating cotton fluff, very flammable material.
The Concept of Unity in Elizabeth Gaskell's "North and South" - Inquiries Journal
It's a very violent scene, she tries to intercede and gets rebuffed by Thornton "Get that woman out of here! To say she's shocked would be an understatement. Then their second meeting is his first class with her father and it's still very tense arguing about the above scene. So definitely not a promising start between them! Our first introduction to Higgins is a positive one as he helps her when she's overwhelmed by the factory workers leaving the mills when the whistle blows.
Second meeting starts to develop Bessy's role more than it is in the book. The scene on the hill serves as a bit of culture shock when Margaret offers to come to their house and "bring a basket", while Bessie laughs wondering what they'd "put in a basket" and Higgins says "here in the North we wait until we're asked to come to someone's house".
We get much more interaction between Bessie who has more scenes than in the book, and I think she lives longer and Margaret, and the friendship seems more real, more equal, than in the book. Also, both Higgins and Bessie speak better in the series, seem less uneducated although in the book it's clear they both have quite a bit of natural intelligence.North and South Thornton Pops the Question
Higgins when the strike is decided: Masters expect us to behave like animals. We will show them we are thinking men. We will not be out-thought. The only enemy of the strike is ourselves! Now we must manage this strike well. His ending has also been changed significantly, and it's much more pleasant to imagine him living out his final days in the Argentine than dying alone in his rooms in Oxford Thornton's visit to Helstone the rose!
Progress, change, and the novel’s ending – Digital North and South at Duquesne University
We get a clearer impression of why Thornton refuses to risk everything in that manner The main element that is altogether missing from the series is Thornton's visit to London and his interactions with Lennox as Margaret's solicitor and manager of her business affairs. This results in the final scene in novel and series being quite different in form, although the start off point a business arrangement and the end result are the same.
The whole tone of the scene is very similar.
Personally I prefer the series' version, much more romantic and more original than another scene between a couple in a drawing room I love it each time these two come head to head Elements from the book that weren't as well conveyed in the series: Also the intensity of Dixon's devotion to Mrs Hill and Margaret's jealousy of her place in her mother's affection.
I enjoyed both the romance and the social commentary on the period industrial revolution, women's roles etc. A friend advised me to watch it based on our common fascination with Pride and Prejudice and our common admiration of Richard Armitageand I can't thank her enough! The book was equally as wonderful, and for once I find it was almost perfectly adapted in the mini-series!
Although I'll admit I'm probably a bit biased as I saw the show before reading the book But if anyone asks me for a "best adaptation from page to screen" some day, I think it will be this series. It may be a little less energetic in its pursuit of competitive trade, but then there is less suffering than I have seen in your mills. We Masters are not all the same, whatever your prejudice against Milton men and their ways. I think it very likely I know I've never found myself in this position before It's difficult to find the words.
Miss Hale my feelings for you are very strong. Please don't go any further. Please don't continue in that way. It's not the way of a gentleman. But I think I deserve to know why I am offensive! It offends me that you should speak to me as if it were your duty to rescue my reputation! You think that because you are rich and my father is in reduced circumstances that you can have me for your possession? I should expect nothing less from someone in trade! You shouldn't because I do not like you and never have!
That you find my feelings for you offensive?! Or that you assume that because I'm in trade I'm only capable of thinking in terms of buying and selling? No of course not! I'm sorry to be so blunt.
I've not learnt how to refuse, how to responds when a man talks to me as you just have. This happens to you every day? Of course, you must have to disappoint so many men that offer you their heart!
I understand you completely. Conversation between Margaret and her brother: The same tradesman that came earlier? They're all the same. What did father mean by coming all this way and placing you in the company of these people!
And he's been very good to us. I have to thank you. I did not do anything for you. Do you not realise the risk you take in being so indiscreet? Have you no explanation for your behaviour that night at the station? You must imagine what I must think! Mr Thornton please, I am aware of what you must think of me. I know of how it must have appeared. Being with a stranger so late at night. The man you saw me with, he I cannot explain it without doing him harm!
I have not the slightest with of prying into the gentleman's secrets. I'm only concerned as your father's friend. I hope you realise that any foolish passion for you on my part is entirely over!
I'm looking to the future. She feels worse about the lie than having been seen with a "gentleman" Frederick Episode 4: Mr Hill to Margaret after a visit by Higgins: To admit that the South has its faults and Mr Thornton has his virtues Gaskell, his forbearer John Oldfield,7 or his daughter with regard to the mutual responsibilities of masters and workers in the riot in Chapter XXII,8 he chooses not to argue his cause.
It again seems to be a choice of unity over binary conflict: The option of preaching in a different forum, as did Priestley, Gaskell, and Lindsey whose quotation of Oldfield is referenced by the author, according to the editorhowever, is neglected in favor of an attempt to sell to Thornton his antiquated cultural capital, and therein lies the connection and resolution of the novel.
Thornton his learning, Mr. Hale is granting him the signifying power of upper class erudition. Hale fails to back Mr.
Bell the Oxford man in this conversation, and shortly after Mr. Bell takes notice of the romantic feelings between his daughter and Mr. Thornton, he resigns himself to obscurity: Unitarian theologians are quick to point out the absence of the Holy Spirit from scripture.
Hale, the Dissenter, has qualms with Anglican doctrine on the Trinity, and furthermore that his Dissension both literally initiates the conflict of the novel and that the unspoken issue frames the thematic content. There are three central conflicts that define the novel in its historical and artistic context: In this passage particularly, but given the apparent transition of sympathy from Mr.
Thornton we can easily apply our insight to the novel as a whole, Elizabeth Gaskell is equating the social conflicts of Britain—and their ultimate and necessary resolution, from her perspective—with her own theological conflicts and resolutions.
A History of the Corruptions of Christianity. Available through google books, http: This is, as the title would indicate, more of a historical essay, but it describes how the Trinity arose from corrupt authorities in the early church and the Roman empire see Part I, sections III-XI. The editor also cites several critical works and biographies Easson, Uglow, etc. In this chapter and subsequent references to it, Margaret removes herself from the context of the romantic heroine, arguing that Mr.